Disposed¶14

Karamveer Singh Dhillon v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC26 Feb 2026CRLR/1744/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Karamveer Singh Dhillon v. State of U.P., CRLR No. 1744 of 2026, Allahabad High Court, Manoj Bajaj J., decided May 14, 2026. Revision against CJM Saharanpur order dated 14.8.2025 in Misc. Case No. 761 of 2024 dismissing application under Section 173(4) BNSS 2023 for FIR registration. Held: concurrent revisional jurisdiction of Sessions Court and High Court; Sessions remedy must ordinarily be availed first; High Court jurisdiction only in exceptional circumstances; none shown; disposed of with liberty to file revision before Sessions Court within three weeks, to be decided on merits.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the complainant-petitioner to file a revision petition before the Court of Sessions; if filed within three weeks, the same shall be decided on merits. ¶14

Karamveer Singh Dhillon vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 1744 of 2026

¶2

Karamveer Singh Dhillon

¶3

.....Revisionist(s)

¶4

Versus
State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Revisionist(s)	: Arun Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 85

¶6

HON'BLE MANOJ BAJAJ, J.

¶7

Petitioner-Complainant has filed this revision petition to challenge the impugned order dated 14.8.2025 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saharanpur in Misc. Case No. 761 of 2024, titled Karamveer Singh Dhillon VS. Jitendra Kumar Sharma and others, whereby application under Section 173(4) Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed by complainant for registration of F.I.R. and investigation by police in respect of alleged commission of cognizable offence has been dismissed.

¶8

No one has appeared on behalf of petitioner.

¶9

No doubt, the impugned order dated 14.8.2025 is revisable, if such a complaint by complainant is dismissed, but the statute has conferred, the concurrent jurisdiction of revision with the court of sessions as well as the High Court. In the considered opinion of this Court, ordinarily a litigant must avail the remedy of revision before the court of sessions, and only under exceptional circumstances, the revisional jurisdiction of this Court can be invoked.

¶10

A perusal of the grounds pleaded in the revision petition would show that no exceptional ground is made out by the petitioner-complainant for straightway invoking the revisioanl jurisdiction of this Court against the impugned order dated 14.8.2025 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate.

¶11

Thus, this Court is not inclined to entertain the revision petition, however, a liberty is granted to the complainant-petitioner to file the revision petition before the Court of Sessions, and if, it is filed within next three weeks, the same shall be decided on merits.

¶12

CRLR No. 1744 of 2026

¶13

¶14

The revision petition is disposed of.

(Manoj Bajaj,J.)

May 14, 2026

P.S.Parihar