Dismissed¶20

Ayyub Khan and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Others

Allahabad HC9 Jan 2026CRLP/906/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Criminal Misc. Writ Petition 906/2025; Ayyub Khan v. State of U.P.; quashing of FIR 0006/2025; BNS 2023 Sections 131, 191(2), 324(2), 329(3), 351(3); Police Station Mishrikh District Sitapur; protection from arrest denied; charge sheet 09.04.2025 filed; mini trial doctrine; Muskan vs. Ishaan Khan (Sataniya) 2025 INSC 1287 relied upon; writ petition dismissed with liberty to seek other remedies; decided 9 January 2026; bench Abdul Moin and Babita Rani.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to the petitioners to pursue appropriate remedy as may be available to them. ¶20

Ayyub Khan and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 906 of 2025

¶3

Ayyub Khan And Another

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

Versus

¶6

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Ganesh Kumar Pathak	Gupta, Amit Kumar
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 11

¶10

HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.

¶11

Case called out. None appears for the petitioners despite a notice having been affixed on the notice board that the matter would be taken at 02.15 PM.

¶12

Instant petition has been filed praying for a quashing of the FIR No.0006 of 2025 under Sections 131, 191(2), 324(2), 329(3) and 351(3) of BNS 2023, Police Station Mishrikh, District Sitapur with a further prayer not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance of the aforesaid FIR.

¶13

Learned AGA on the basis of instructions dated 02.09.2025 sent by Sri Gudiram, Sub-Inspector, Police Station Mishrikh, District Sitapur, states that a charge sheet dated 09.04.2025 has been submitted before the supervisory authority.

¶14

Learned AGA further points out that the charge sheet has been filed after collecting credible evidence from perusal of which it emerges that prima facie the crime committed by the petitioner/accused is borne out.

¶15

Considering the aforesaid, the Court is not expected to hold a mini trial in order to verify the allegations as levelled in the FIR and the charge sheet vis-a-vis the grounds as taken by the petitioner in the instant petition keeping in view the law laid down by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Muskan vs. Ishaan Khan (Sataniya) and others; 2025 INSC 1287 .

¶16

Even otherwise, having considered the allegations as levelled in the

¶17

CRLP No. 906 of 2025

¶18

¶19

FIR vis-a-vis the grounds taken by the petitioner in the writ petition no case on merits is made out.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioners to pursue appropriate remedy as may be available to them.

¶21

(Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.)

¶22

January 9, 2026

¶23

A. Katiyar

¶24

Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Ayyub Khan and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ayyub Khan and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Vikash Yadav and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Others

Putti Lal vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. of Home Affairs Lko. and Others

Anil Kumar Pandey vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. and 3 Others

Monish Steel @ Siraj Khan and Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Others

Smt. Nargis and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Govt. Lko. and Others

Ram Bahadur vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Govt. Lko. and Others