Dismissed¶17

Manoj Gupta and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC6 May 2026CRLP/7024/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 7024 of 2023; Manoj Gupta v. State of U.P.; quashing of FIR sought; Case Crime No. 121 of 2023; Sections 363, 504, 506 erstwhile IPC; chargesheet CS 109/2023 filed; petition dismissed with liberty to challenge charge sheet before appropriate forum; counsel Sandeep Kumar Tripathi for petitioners; G.A. for State; decided May 7, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Liberty conserved to the petitioners to question the charge sheet in an appropriate proceeding at the appropriate forum; no further indulgence granted and the petition was consigned to records. ¶17

Manoj Gupta and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7024 of 2023

¶2

Manoj Gupta And 2 Others

¶3

.....Petitioner(s)

¶4

Versus

¶5

State Of U.P. And 3 Others

¶6

.....Respondent(s)

¶7

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Sandeep Kumar Tripathi
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 1

¶9

HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J.

¶10

List is being revised.

¶11

This writ petition questions the first information report in connection with Case Crime No. 121 of 2023, under Sections 363, 504, 506 of erstwhile IPC however, nobody is present on behalf of the petitioners to press the writ petition, however, learned AGA for the State is present.

¶12

Office has submitted following report:

¶13

"It is most humbly submitted that as per report submitted by the Legal Cell, O/o Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh, chargesheet no.CS 109/2023 has been filed.

¶14

Therefore, In view of above, the case is put up for order before Hon'ble Court."

¶15

In view of the fact that charge sheet in the case has already been submitted by the police after collecting evidence at its level finding petitioners' involvement in the offence complained of, in our considered view it would be appropriate that the charge sheet so filed may be questioned in an appropriate proceeding at appropriate forum.

¶16

Accordingly, we decline to grant any further indulgence in the matter.

¶17

Petition is, accordingly dismissed, consigned to records with aforesaid liberty.

¶18

May 7, 2026 Mohit

¶19

(Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.)

¶20

Digitally signed by :- MOHIT KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Manoj Gupta and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manoj Gupta and 2 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ratnakar Pandey Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Trisha Saxena Vs Union of India and 2 Others

Ankish Tripathi and 2 Others vs State of Uttar Pradesh and 3 Others

Sushma Keshari and 2 Others vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Liyakat vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sarfaraz Ahmad vs Aadhar Housing Finance Ltd. and Another