Disposed¶8

Ram Bharosi and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC19 Apr 2026CRLP/5576/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 5576 of 2026; decided April 20, 2026; Rajeev Misra J. and Sudhanshu Chauhan J.; FIR quashing prayer refused after challenge given up; direction to decide bail application per Satender Kumar Antil v. CBI (2021) 10 SCC 773; B.N.S. Sections 329(3), 329(4), 324(4), 351(4); Case Crime No. 04 of 2026; P.S. Mansukhpura, District Agra; first informant Ranu Sharma, widow daughter-in-law of petitioner-1; interim order discharged; petition disposed.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition disposed of finally with a direction that if the petitioners appear before the Court below and apply for bail, their bail application shall be decided in the light of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Satender Kumar Antil (Supra); interim order, if any, discharged. ¶8

Ram Bharosi and 5 Others Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5576 of 2026

¶2

Ram Bharosi And 5 Others

¶3

.....Petitioner(s)

¶4

Versus

¶5

State Of U.P. And 3 Others

¶6

.....Respondent(s)

¶7

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Girish Kumar, Vijay Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Dharmendra Singh, G.A.

¶8

Court No. - 49

¶9

HON'BLE RAJEEV MISRA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.

¶10

Heard Mr. Vijay Tripathi, the learned counsel for petitioners, the learned A.G.A. for State-respondents 1, 2 and 3 and Mr. Dharmendra Singh, the learned counsel representing first informant respondent-4.

¶11

2. Perused the record.

¶12

Petitioners-Ram Bharosi And 5 Others have approached this Court by means of present criminal misc. writ petition challenging the FIR dated 29.01.2026 lodged by first informant-respondent-4 Ranu Sharma and registered as Case Crime No. 04 of 2026, under Sections 329(3), 329(4), 324(4), 351(4) of B.N.S., Police Station-Mansukhpura, District-Agra.

¶13

Present case very peculiar inasmuch as the criminal prosecution has been initiated by the widow daughter-in-law of the petitioner-1.

¶14

After some arguments, the learned counsel for petitioners gave up the challenge to the impugned FIR. He, however, submits that in the facts and circumstances of the case, interest of justice shall better be served, in case, a direction is issued by this Court to Court below to decide the bail application of petitioners in the light of law laid down by the Apex Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (2021) 10 SCC 773 . It is thus urged by the learned counsel for petitioners that present writ petition be disposed of in the light of above.

¶15

Learned A.G.A. for State-respondents 1, 2 and 3 has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioners.

¶16

CRLP No. 5576 of 2026

¶17

¶18

In view of above, the prayer prayed for by means of present writ petition is refused.

¶19

However, this writ petition is disposed of finally with a direction that in case, petitioners appear before Court below and apply for bail then their bail application shall be decided by Court concerned in the light of the law laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (Supra) .

¶20

Interim order, if any, stands discharged.

¶21

April 20, 2026 Imtiyaz

¶22

(Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Rajeev Misra,J.)

¶23

Digitally signed by :- IMTIYAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ram Bharosi and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Bharosi and 5 Others v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhanprasad vs State of U.P. and 4 Others

Sanjeev Kumar and 7 Others vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Prem Narayan vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Mahi and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Jaheer Alam Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Vikas Chaudhary Vs State of Up and 2 Others