Dismissed¶13

Anshika and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 4 Others

Allahabad HC21 May 2026CRLP/4771/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Procedural (non-merits) order: Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 4771 of 2026 by Anshika and another against State of U.P. and others, Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench, dismissed as withdrawn on 21 May 2026 at the request of petitioners' counsel owing to subsequent developments, with liberty to file afresh. Bench: Abdul Moin, J. and Pramod Kumar Srivastava, J. No statutes, precedents, issues or quantum involved; of limited value except to show withdrawal with liberty to file afresh.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh. ¶13

Anshika and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 4 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4771 of 2026

Anshika And Another

.....Petitioner(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 4 Others

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Petitioner(s)	: Aseem Kumar	Pandey, Anchal Verma,
	Shivani
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 11

¶10

HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State-respondents.

¶12

Sri Aseem Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for petitioners states that on account of subsequent developments he does not intend to press the instant writ petition and prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh.

¶13

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.

¶14

May 21, 2026 Arvind

¶15

(Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.)

¶16

Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Anshika and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anshika and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 4 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suresh Gautam vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and 3 Others

Shrawan Kumar Tiwari vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Others

Girija Shankar Shukla @ Girija Shankar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 7 Others

Sayra Bano and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 3 Others

Mushtak Ali and 2 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home U.P. Lko. and 3 Others

Suneeta and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Others