Sadhana Shrivastava and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Others

Instant writ petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 to protect and not to interfere in the peaceful marital life of the petitioners.

¶11

The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that both the petitioners are major and they have married each other on their own volition on 18.04.2026 in Arya Samaj, Sector-H (Harsh Vihar Puraniya), Aliganj, Lucknow. A copy of the marriage certificate as well as photographs have been enclosed as Annexure No.1 and 2 to this petition. In support of the petitioners being major, the petitioner nos.1 and 2 have annexed their High School mark sheet from which it emerges that both the petitioners are major. It is contended that opposite party no.3 with the collusion of family members of petitioner No.1 is creating hindrance in the peaceful married life of the petitioners. Learned counsel has further stated that no First Information Report has been registered against the petitioners in this regard.

¶12

In this regard, it would be apt to refer to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. and another2006 (5) SCC 475 , wherein the Apex Court in para-17 has observed as under:-

¶13

CRLP No. 4516 of 2026

¶14

2

¶15

"17. .... This is a free and democratic country, and once a person becomes a major he or she can marry whosoever he/she likes. If the parents of the boy or girl do not approve of such inter-caste or inter-religious marriage the maximum they can do is that they can cut-off social relations with the son or the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes such intercaste or inter-religious marriage. We, therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities throughout the country will see to it that if any boy or girl who is a major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or man who is a major, the couple is not harassed by anyone nor subjected to threats or acts of violence, and anyone who gives such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against such persons and further stern action is taken against such persons as provided by law."

¶16

The petitioners have also pleaded for protection under Article 21 of the Constitution of India which guarantees liberty to lead life of their own with dignity.

¶17

Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the opposite parties not to interfere in peaceful life and liberty of the petitioners in any manner.

¶18

It is made clear that if any F.I.R. is already registered on the issue, the order passed by this Court shall automatically stand discharged.

¶19

It is however made clear that this Court has not entered into nor adjudicated the age of the petitioners nor veracity/validity of the alleged marriage.

¶20

The petitioners shall get their marriage registered under the "Uttar Pradesh Marriages Registration Rules, 2017" within two months from today.

¶21

The Registrar of Marriages concerned is directed to process and issue the registration certificate to the petitioners, strictly in accordance with law, at the earliest.

¶22

(Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.)

¶23

May 14, 2026

¶24

Arvind

¶25

Digitally signed by :- ARVIND KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Sadhana Shrivastava and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sadhana Shrivastava and Another v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Faisal Hasan vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and 2 Others

Naresh Kumar Gupta Thru. His Wife Kalpana Gupta vs C.B.I. Thru. Superintendent of Police and Head of Branchcbi Acb Lko.

Smt. Sachi Tiwari and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and 3 Others

Anurag Mehrotra vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko

Warish Ali vs State of U.P. Thru. the Prin. Secy. Ministry of Home Lko. and 3 Others

Monu Mishra @ Manish Mishra vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko. and Others