The writ petition was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner's counsel did not appear before the court. Any interim order previously granted was vacated.
Petition dismissed; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 3914 of 2025
Seema Pandey
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
Union Of India And 4 Othery
.....Respondent(s)
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Satya Nisth Dwivedi |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : G.A., Manoj Kumar Singh |
Court No. - 48
HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. HON'BLE TARUN SAXENA, J.
(Tarun Saxena,J.) (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.)
September 16, 2026
Saurabh
Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Seema Pandey
Union Of India
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
TARUN SAXENA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
