Dismissed¶15

Ram Nain Yadav and 3 Others v. State of Up and 3 Others

Allahabad HC22 Apr 2026CRLP/21215/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition against FIR and charge sheet dismissed; alternative/appropriate forum direction; charge sheet filed after evidence collection; Case Crime No. 627 of 2024; Charge Sheet No. 524/24; Sections 85, 115(2), 351(3) BNS; Sections 3/4 D.P. Act; P.S. Khorbar, District Gorakhpur; petitioners absent; liberty to challenge charge sheet before appropriate forum; Allahabad High Court, Division Bench (Ajit Kumar and Indrajeet Shukla, JJ.), decided April 23, 2026.

What did the court decide?

Liberty to question the charge sheet in an appropriate proceeding at the appropriate forum; petition dismissed and consigned to records. ¶15

Ram Nain Yadav and 3 Others Vs State of Up and 3 Others — Dowry and Cruelty | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21215 of 2024

¶3

Ram Nain Yadav And 3 Others

¶4

.....Petitioner(s)

¶5

	Versus
State Of Up And 3 Others		.....Respondent(s)
Counsel for Petitioner(s)	:	Sanjeev Kumar Yadav
Counsel for Respondent(s)	:	G.A.

¶6

Court No. - 1

¶7

HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J.

¶8

List is being revised.

¶9

This writ petition questions the first information report in connection with Case Crime No. 627 of 2024, under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(3) BNS and 3/4 D.P. Act, Charge Sheet No. 524/24, P.S. Khorbar, District Gorakhpur, however, nobody is present on behalf of the petitioners to press the writ petition, however, Sri Anand Vikram Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State is present.

¶10

Office has submitted following report:

¶11

"It is most humbly submitted that as per report submitted by the Legal Cell, O/o Director General of Police, Uttar Pradesh, chargesheet has been filed.

¶12

Therefore, in view of above, the case is put up for order before Hon'ble Court."

¶13

In view of the fact that charge sheet in the case has already been submitted by the police after collecting evidence at its level finding petitioners' involvement in the offence complained of, in our considered view it would be appropriate that the charge sheet so filed is questioned in an appropriate proceeding at appropriate forum.

¶14

Accordingly, we decline to grant any further indulgence in the matter.

¶15

Petition is accordingly dismissed, consigned to records with aforesaid liberty.

¶16

April 23, 2026 v.k. updh.

¶17

(Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Ajit Kumar,J.)

¶18

Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR UPADHYAY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ram Nain Yadav and 3 Others v. State of Up and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Nain Yadav and 3 Others v. State of Up and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shahnawaz vs Union of India and 2 Others

Arvind Kumar Upadhyay vs Union of India and 5 Others

Shivam Gupta and Another vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Shashi Bhushan vs Punjab National Bank and 3 Others

Shahvez Abdullah vs State of U.P. and 6 Others

M/S. Maya Lime Works vs State of U.P. and 4 Others