Roshan Lal v. State of U.P. (Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 2075 of 2026, Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench, dismissed March 10, 2026) — writ petition dismissed as infructuous on counsel's submission that the F.I.R. had been lodged; no statutes cited, no precedents engaged, no substantive holdings.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2075 of 2026
Roshan Lal
.....Petitioner(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others
.....Respondent(s)
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : Amit Kumar, Shreya |
|---|---|
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : G.A. |
Court No. - 10
HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J. HON'BLE ZAFEER AHMAD, J.
(Zafeer Ahmad,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.)
March 10, 2026
Akanksha Sri/-
Digitally signed by :- AKANKSHA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
How this case reached the court
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since the F.I.R. has been lodged, the petition has rendered infructuous and may be dismissed as such.¶11
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
