Arvind Gupta v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20241 of 2026 Court No. - 45 HON'BLE SALIL KUMAR RAI, J. HON'BLE PADAM NARAIN MISHRA, J. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the A.G.A. for the State. The present petition has been filed challenging the First Information Report
Disposed 29 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 20241 of 2026
Arvind Gupta
.....Petitioner(s)
| Versus | ||
|---|---|---|
| State Of U.P. And 3 Others | .....Respondent(s) | |
| Counsel for Petitioner(s) | : | Arvind Kumar Upadhyay |
| Counsel for Respondent(s) | : | G.A. |
Court No. - 45
HON'BLE SALIL KUMAR RAI, J. HON'BLE PADAM NARAIN MISHRA, J.
Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the A.G.A. for the State.
The present petition has been filed challenging the First Information Report dated 10.08.2026 registered as Case Crime No. 82 of 2026, under Sections 318(4), 62 B.N.S., 2023, Police Station Swaroop Nagar, District Kanpur Nagar.
We have perused the FIR, which prima facie discloses commission of offence and therefore, the prayer made to quash the FIR cannot be entertained in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the cases of State of Telangana Vs. Habib Abdullah Jellani reported in (2017) 2 SCC 779 and Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others reported in (2021) SCC Online SC 315 and as such, we are of the view that no interference is warranted.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRLP/20241/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court