Dismissed¶¶14

Vimal Kumar and Another v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC26 Apr 2026CRLA/4670/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail appeal dismissed as not pressed; Vimal Kumar; Ramsajivan; State of U.P.; Sessions Trial No. 47 of 2023; Sections 304, 328 IPC; Section 3(2)(v) SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989; Complaint Case No. 43 of 2019; Janak Nandini; Vimal Kumar Dubey; Special Judge (SC/ST Act) Jalaun at Orai; Anticipatory Bail Application No. 56 of 2025; liberty to file better/fresh anticipatory bail petition; no apprehension of arrest; pending applications disposed.

What did the court decide?

Appeal and prayer for anticipatory bail dismissed as not pressed for both appellants; appellant no. 2 Ramsajivan given liberty as prayed to file a better petition; pending applications disposed of. ¶¶14

Vimal Kumar and Another Vs State of U.P. and… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 4670 of 2025

¶3

Vimal Kumar And Another

¶4

	Versus		.....App	ellant(s)
State of U.P. and Another			.....Respo	ndent(s)
Counsel for Appellant(s)	: Ajay Singh Mathur	Sengar,	Rakesh	Kumar
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: G.A., Sushil	Kumar
Court No.- 75

¶5

HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J.

¶6

1. List revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Ajay Singh Sengar, learned counsel for the appellants, Sri Sushil Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2, Sri V.D. Ojha, learned counsel for the State and perused the record.

¶8

This appeal has been filed by the appellants- Vimal Kumar and Ramsajivan with the prayers to set aside the impugned order dated 17.4.2025 passed by Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Jalaun at Orai passed in Anticipatory Bail Application No. 56 of 2025, Vimal Kumar and another vs. State of U.P., in Sessions Trial No. 47 of 2023, u/s 304, 328 I.P.C. and Section 3(2)v Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, arising out of Complaint Case No. 43 of 2019, Smt. Janak Nandini vs. Vimal Kumar Dubey and others, now State vs. Vimal Kumar Dubey and others, with the further prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the appellants in the said case.

¶9

Learned counsel for the appellants submits that in so far as the appellant no. 1 Vimal Kumar is concerned, there is no apprehension of his arrest and thus the present appeal along with the prayer for anticipatory bail be dismissed not pressed. He further submits that in so far as the prayer for anticipatory in so far as it relates to the appellant no. 2/Ramsajivan is concerned, the same be dismissed as not pressed as some more documents and facts need to be brought on the record and as such he shall be filing a better petition for the same.

¶10

CRLA No. 4670 of 2025

¶11

¶12