Dismissed¶15

Mukut Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC27 Mar 2026CRLA/340/1994

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Mukut Singh vs. State of U.P., Criminal Appeal No. - 340 of 1994, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, decided March 28, 2026 by Mrs. Vani Ranjan Agrawal, J. Withdrawal application (Criminal Misc. Withdrawal Application No.3 of 2026) allowed; appeal dismissed as withdrawn as infructuous following appellant's acquittal by trial Court vide judgement and order dated 16.1.2023; A.G.A. (Rahul Asthana) raised no objection. Keywords: withdrawal application, acquittal, infructuous appeal, dismissal as withdrawn, unopposed prayer.

What did the court decide?

Criminal Misc. Withdrawal Application No.3 of 2026 allowed; Criminal Appeal No. - 340 of 1994 dismissed as withdrawn in view of the appellant's acquittal by the trial Court. ¶15

Mukut Singh Vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 340 of 1994

Mukut Singh

.....Appellant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.

.....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Appellant(s)	: Manoj	Gautam, S.S. Yadav
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: A.G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 93

¶10

HON'BLE MRS. VANI RANJAN AGRAWAL, J.

¶11

Ref:- Criminal Misc. Withdrawal Application No.3 of 2026:-

¶12

Heard Ms. Abhilasha, learned counsel holding brief of Sri Krishna Mohan Rai, learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Rahul Asthana, learned A.G.A. for the State respondent.

¶13

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant has already been acquitted vide judgement and order dated 16.1.2023 passed by the learned trial Court (a copy of said order is annexed as annexure No.1 to this application) and now this matter has become infructuous due acquittal of the appellant by the learned trial Court. Thus, she prayed that this appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn.

¶14

Learned A.G.A. raised no objection to the prayer made by learned counsel for the appellant.

¶15

In this view of the matter, the withdrawal application is allowed. Consequently, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

¶16

March 28, 2026 Dev

¶17

(Mrs. Vani Ranjan Agrawal,J.)

¶18

Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mukut Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukut Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shambhu Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Bundo Vs State of U.P.

Jai Shri Alias Doctor Vs State

Tar Babu @ Tara Chand Vs State

Kallu and Other Vs State of U.P.

Bhopal Vs State of U.P.