Disposed¶14

Vinod Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. /Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Allahabad HC29 Jan 2026CRLA/173/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Sentence-enhancement criminal appeal (admission stage only, no adjudication): enhancement of sentence under Section 14-A(1), S.C./S.T. (P.A.) Act, 1989; order of sentence dated 08.01.2026 by Special Judge, S.C./S.T. (P.A.) Act, Ambedkar Nagar; Session Case No.348 of 2024; appellant Vinod Kumar; respondent no.2 unnamed in text; High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 27, Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra, J.; judgment dated January 29, 2026; next hearing date 11.03.2026; no cases cited; no quantum stated.

What the court decided

AI extract

Vinod Kumar vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. /Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW

¶2

CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 173 of 2026

Vinod Kumar

.....Appellant(s)

Versus

State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. /Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another

¶7

.....Respondent(s)

¶8

Counsel for Appellant(s)	: Amarjeet Murtaza,	Singh Wali Naw	Rakhra, az Khan	Nadeem
Counsel for Respondent(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 27

¶10

HON'BLE RAM MANOHAR NARAYAN MISHRA, J.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel for the respondent no.2.

¶12

Instant criminal appeal has been preferred for enhancement of sentence awarded to respondent no.2 under Section 14-A (1) of S.C./S.T. (P.A.) Act, 1989 against the order of sentence dated 08.01.2026 passed by learned court of Special Judge S.C./S.T. (P.A.) Act, Ambedkar Nagar in Session Case No.348 of 2024.

¶13

Shri A.P. Mishra, Advocate has put in appearance for respondent no.2 and has stated that he will file his Vakalatnama in the office. Therefore, notice to the respondent no.2 is dispensed with.

¶14

Admit.

¶15

List on 11.03.2026.

¶16

Counter affidavit, if any, be filed by the next date.

¶17

(Ram Manohar Narayan Mishra,J.)

¶18

January 29, 2026 Mohd. Sharif

¶19

Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD SHARIF High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench

Vinod Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. /Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Vinod Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. /Prin. Secy. Home Lko. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Omkar vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and 2 Others

Sachin Kumar @ Sachin Kumar Mishra vs State of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Smt. Poonam Gupta vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. and Another

Chandrakesh Mishra and Another vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. of Home, Lko and 2 Others

Shudhanshu Upadhayay vs State of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Lko and 4 Others

Intijar Ahmad @ Bablu and 4 Others vs State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Home Lko. and Another