Dismissed¶13
Smt. Ketki Devi v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Mahila Evam Bal Vikas Lko and 4 Others
Allahabad HCCMRAD/216/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Review application dismissed for want of prosecution; condonation of delay application (C.M. Application No. 1 of 2024) dismissed as none appeared for applicant; non-appearance/want of prosecution; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Smt. Ketki Devi v. State of U.P. thru Secy. Mahila Evam Bal Vikas and others; counsel: Jagan Nath Singh for applicant, C.S.C. for opposite parties; coram Rajan Roy and Abdesh Kumar Chaudhary, JJ.; decided February 11, 2026.
What did the court decide?
As none appeared for the applicant to press the application for condonation of delay in filing the review application, that application is dismissed for want of prosecution. ¶12