Aman Nagpal v. Naman Jain and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CIVIL REVISION…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CIVIL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 86 of 2026 Court No. - 54 HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J. 1. Sri Anand Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the revisionist and learned counsel for the respondent are present. 2. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that he does not wish to
Disposed 29 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CIVIL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 86 of 2026
Aman Nagpal
.....Revisionist(s)
Versus
Naman Jain And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Subodh Tripathi, Ved Prakash Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Sachin, Rajesh Dutta Pandey Court No. - 54
HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J.
- Sri Anand Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the revisionist and learned counsel for the respondent are present.
- Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that he does not wish to press this revision and the same may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh revision.
- Accordingly, the present revision is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
- Certified copy of the relevant documents be returned to the learned counsel for the revisionist, after retaining photostat copy of the same on record.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CLRED/86/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court