Dismissed¶20

Parmanand Dubey v. B.L. Chaurasiya, Deputyd Director of Education and Another

Allahabad HC13 May 2026CAPL/9406/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt application (civil) dismissed as infructuous; compliance with writ Court order dated 04.04.2023 in Writ-A No. 27395 of 2009; payment of Rs. 55,94,117/- to applicant; salary for period worked as Officiating Principal; Sampurnanand Sanskrit University; Statute 12.22 struck down; Dr. Bramhanand Shukla; Dr. Jai Prakash Narayan Singh (FB); Allahabad High Court; Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, J.; CAPL No. 9406 of 2023; Parmanand Dubey v. B.L. Chaurasiya.

What did the court decide?

Since the amount has been paid to the applicant in compliance with the writ Court's order, the present contempt application is rendered infructuous and stands dismissed. ¶20

Parmanand Dubey Vs B.L. Chaurasiya, Deputyd Director of Education and Another — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 9406 of 2023

¶3

Parmanand Dubey

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

Versus B.L. Chaurasiya, Deputyd Director Of Education And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Purushottam Mani Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :

¶6

Court No. - 9

¶7

HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

¶8

The writ Court on 04.04.2023 while allowing Writ-A No. 27395 of 2009 passed the following order:-

¶9

" 1. Heard Sri A.C. Tiwari, Sri N.L. Pandey, Sri J.A. Azmi and Sri Akhilesh Kumar Singh learned counsel for petitioner and Sri V.B. Mishra, learned counsel for respondent-University in respective petitions.

¶10

2. In the writ petition, only question for consideration is whether petitioner, while working as Officiating Principal, entitled to salary for post of Principal. Relying on Statute 12.22 of the first Statute of Sampurnanand Sanskrit University, his salary as Officiating Principal was denied.

¶11

3. It is informed that aforesaid provision has been struck down by a learned Single Judge in Service Bench No. 1590 of 2008, Dr. Bramhanand Shukla Vs. State of U.P. through Secretary, High Education decided on 29.5.2019 relying upon a Full Bench Judgment of this Court in Dr. Jai Prakash Narayan Singh Vs. State of U.P. and others, [2014 (8) ADJ 617 (FB)]

¶12

4. Sri V. B. Mishra, learned counsel for University could not dispute aforesaid facts.

¶13

5. Thus, in view of aforesaid decisions and for the reasons given therein, this writ petition is allowed.

¶14

CAPL No. 9406 of 2023

¶15

¶16

6. The petitioner shall be entitled for salary for the period he worked as Officiating Principal and it shall be paid by respondents expeditiously.

¶17

7. The entire exercise shall be completed as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order."

¶18

Today, instructions have come from the State side, which are taken on record.

¶19

In the instructions, it has been stated that an amount of Rs. 55,94,117/- has been paid to the applicant complying the order of the writ Court.

¶20

In view of said fact, as the amount has been paid to the applicant, the present contempt application is rendered infructuous and stands dismissed .

¶21

(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)

¶22

May 14, 2026

¶23

A. V. Singh

¶24

Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Parmanand Dubey v. B.L. Chaurasiya, Deputyd Director of Education and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Parmanand Dubey v. B.L. Chaurasiya, Deputyd Director of Education and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arvind Kumar Dwivedi vs Sri Rajesh Kumar Verma

Nirmala Singh vs Sri Naval Kishor, Deputy Director of Education (Secondary) and Another

Gargi Chauhan vs Dr Shweta Puthia

Deepak Kumar Dwivedi Vs Prem Prakash, Executive Engineer, Electricity Disribution Division-Iii, Civil Line, Moradabad

Parvati Vs Dr. Vandana Mishra, Sub Divisional Officer, Gunaur

Vikram Sharma Vs Sri Anil Kumar Special Secretary Urban Development Anubhag