Contempt application dismissed for want of prosecution when neither the applicant nor counsel appeared despite the matter being listed under a heading directing decision without adjournment; notice issued, if any, stood discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 627 of 2017
Jugul Kishore
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Sri Raj Kumar Pandit Basic Shiksha Adhikari Amethi Distt. Am .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anjani Kumar Dvivedi, Mahendra Bahadur Singh, Raj Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Shailendra Singh Rajawat, Prashant Arora
Court No. - 8
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
Case has been called out.
The present case is listed under the heading "These matters shall not be adjourned".
A notice has been pasted outside the Court room prescribing that the matters listed under the heading "These matters shall not be adjourned" shall not be revised and appropriate orders shall be passed in the first round itself.
Neither the learned counsel for the applicant is present nor any request has been made on his behalf for adjournment of the case.
In view of the above, the contempt application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Notice issued, if any, stands discharged.
(Manish Kumar,J.)
October 17, 2025
Ashish
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Jugul Kishore
Sri Raj Kumar Pandit Basic Shiksha Adhikari Amethi Distt. Am
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
