Putti Lal v. Shri Sanjay Prasad and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION…
Case summary
From the record, as published by the registry
JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6267 of 2026 Court No. - 53 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. The present contempt application has been preferred alleging willful defiance of the order dated 20.11.2025 passed in Writ- A No. 17493 of 2025, order whereof is quoted
Disposed 9 days after registration.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6267 of 2026
Putti Lal
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Shri Sanjay Prasad And Another
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jaswant Rai
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
Court No. - 53
HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
- The present contempt application has been preferred alleging willful defiance of the order dated 20.11.2025 passed in Writ-A No. 17493 of 2025, order whereof is quoted hereinunder.-
"Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
Controversy raised in the present petition has already been adjudicated by this Court in Writ Petition No. 44330 of 2012 (Ghanshyam Tiwari & others vs. State of U.P. & others) against which a special appeal and S.L.P. has already been rejected. Order dated 07.09.2012 passed in aforesaid writ petition reads as under :-
"The sole grievance raised of the petitioners in the present petition is as to whether the period spent on training prior to appointment as a Constable in the Police Department can be counted for granting them promotional pay scale.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- CAPL/6267/2026
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court