Contempt application dismissed as not pressed due to inadvertent omission of facts and documents. Liberty granted to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 494 of 2026
Sher Bahadur
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Mr. Gajendra Singh Sub Divisional Officer Tehsil Bikapur Ayodhya .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amitesh Pratap Singh, Mohd. Kashif Rafi, Naveen Kumar Singh, Shesh Ram Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
Court No. - 8
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that due to inadvertent mistake, certain facts and documents, which are necessary for proper adjudication of the present case, are left to be mentioned/enclosed with the present case, thus the applicant does not want to press the instant case and the same may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file afresh contempt application (civil).
As prayed, the present case is dismissed as not pressed with liberty, as prayed for.
Office is directed to return the certified copy of the documents, if any, to the learned counsel for the applicant while retaining photocopy of the same.
(Manish Kumar,J.)
February 6, 2026
Ashish
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Sher Bahadur
Mr. Gajendra Singh
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
