Contempt application alleging non-compliance with a writ court judgment was dismissed as infructuous after counsel conceded that full compliance had been effected; any notice issued earlier stood discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2092 of 2025
Navneet Kumar Srivastava
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Dr. Mahendra Dev, Director Of Edu. Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anshuman Singh, Ashok Kumar Singh, Geetika Yadav, Nishchay Anand Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
Court No. - 8
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
Shri Anshuman Singh, learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that the judgment and order passed by the writ court has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
As such, the present contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. Notice issued earlier, if any, stands discharged.
(Manish Kumar,J.)
January 19, 2026 S. Kumar
Digitally signed by :- SANTOSH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt application should be dismissed as infructuous once the judgment and order of the writ court had been complied with.
Navneet Kumar Srivastava
Dr. Mahendra Dev, Director Of Edu. Lko.
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
4 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
