Disposed¶13

Shiv Kumar and 4 Others v. Bhanu Prakash Ram, Director Horticulture and Food Processing Lko.

Allahabad HC13 May 2026CAPL/1924/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Contempt notice order; alleged violation of order dated 10.04.2025 in Writ-A No. 3932 of 2025; steps dispensed with; service through Office of Chief Standing Counsel; listing on 01.07.2026 within top 30 cases; show cause or personal appearance; Shiv Kumar and 4 Others v. Bhanu Prakash Ram, Director Horticulture and Food Processing; Lucknow Bench; Saurabh Lavania, J.

What did the court decide?

Notice issued with steps dispensed with; matter listed on 01.07.2026 (within top 30 cases) for the opposite party/contemnor to show cause why contempt proceedings should not be initiated, failing which personal appearance before the Court is required. ¶13

Shiv Kumar and 4 Others vs Bhanu Prakash Ram, Director Horticulture and Food Processing Lko. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶13

Issue for consideration

Whether contempt proceedings should be initiated against the opposite party/contemnor for violating the order of this Court dated 10.04.2025 passed in Writ-A No. 3932 of 2025.

¶13

Court's answer

Case to be listed/put up on 01.07.2026 within top 30 cases, showing the Chief Standing Counsel (C.S.C.) in the cause list as counsel for the opposite party.

¶13

Ratio / Principle

Formal steps dispensed with: copies of the petition have been provided to the State Counsel and would be provided to the opposite party, an officer of the State of U.P., through the Office of the Chief Standing Counsel.

¶12

Key takeaways

On the date fixed the opposite party/contemnor shall show cause why contempt proceedings should not be initiated for violating the order dated 10.04.2025 in Writ-A No. 3932 of 2025, failing which he shall appear in person before the Court on the next date fixed.ratio¶13

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Contempt Application (Civil) No. 1924 of 2026, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench, Court No. 7 (Saurabh Lavania, J.; order dated May 13, 2026): On an application by Shiv Kumar and 4 others alleging violation by the opposite party, Bhanu Prakash Ram, Director Horticulture and Food Processing, Lucknow, of this Court's order dated 10.04.2025 in Writ-A No. 3932 of 2025, the Court issued notice and dispensed with formal steps, copies having been provided to the State Counsel and to be furnished to the opposite party through the Office of the Chief Standing Counsel. The case was listed for 01.07.2026 within top 30 cases, with the C.S.C. to be shown in the cause list as counsel for the opposite party; the opposite party/contemnor was directed to show cause why contempt proceedings should not be initiated, failing which he was to appear in person before the Court on the next date fixed. The mode was adopted for early disposal of the contempt application.

Shiv Kumar and 4 Others v. Bhanu Prakash Ram, Director Horticulture and Food Processing Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shiv Kumar and 4 Others v. Bhanu Prakash Ram, Director Horticulture and Food Processing Lko.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamal Bhatia and Another vs Saroj Gupta

Taekwondo Federation of India Thru. Secy. General Dr. Gm. Jimmy R. Jagtiani vs Ishari K. Ganesh and 19 Others

Lokesh Kumar vs Sri Bhanu Prakash Ram, Director, Horticulture and Food Processing, Lko. and Another

Manju Devi vs Sri Kuldeep Singh, Genral Manager, Jal Kal Vibhag Aishbagh, Lko.

Dharam Raj Singh and 2 Others vs Pradeep Singh, Upziladhikari Tehsil Tarabganj Gonda

Ram Pratap Singh vs Rajeev Raj, City Magistrate in Charge Officer Mining Distt. Unnao