Disposed¶17

Shubham v. Smt Apoorva Yadav

Allahabad HC18 Mar 2026CAPL/1668/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CAPL No. 1668 of 2026, Allahabad High Court, Rohit Ranjan Agarwal, J., decided 18.03.2026 — Contempt of Courts Act S.12 — willful disobedience of order dated 01.08.2025 in Writ Petition No.25433 of 2025 — prima facie case found — no notice issued at this stage — three months' further time to comply — liberty to approach Court again — disposed of.

What did the court decide?

No notice issued at this stage; opposite party granted three months' further time to comply with the writ court order dated 01.08.2025 from date of production of a certified copy; applicant to supply stamped registered and self-addressed envelopes to the office; liberty reserved to applicant to approach the court again in case of non-compliance. ¶17

Shubham vs Smt Apoorva Yadav — Contempt of Court | Allahabad HC (2026)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1668 of 2026

¶3

Shubham .....Applicant(s) Versus Smt Apoorva Yadav .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandra Shekhar Pal, Sunil Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :

¶4

Court No. - 9

¶5

HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.

¶6

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant.

¶7

2. The present contempt application has been filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for punishing the Opposite Party for willful disobedience of the judgment and order dated 01.08.2025 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.25433 of 2025.

¶8

3. It is contended that applicant had filed aforesaid writ, which was disposed of vide order dated 01.08.2025. Copy of the said order was served to the opposite party personally on 12.09.2025, but the said direction has not been complied with by the opposite party till date.

¶9

4. Prima facie , a case has been made out for punishing the opposite party for willful disobedience of the judgment and order passed in the aforesaid writ petition.

¶10

5. However, no notice is issued to the opposite party at this stage. The opposite party is granted three months’ further time to comply with the order dated 01.08.2025 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.25433 of 2025 from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.

¶11

6. The applicant shall supply a duly stamped registered envelope addressed to the opposite party and another self-addressed envelope to the office within one week from today. The office shall send a copy of this order along with

¶12

CAPL No. 1668 of 2026

¶13

¶14

the self-addressed envelope of the applicant with a copy of contempt application to the opposite party within one week thereafter and keep a record thereof.

¶15

7. The opposite party shall comply with the directions of the writ court and intimate the applicant the order through the self-addressed envelop within a week thereafter.

¶16

8. In case, the opposite party does not comply with the order, it would be open to the applicant to approach this court again.

¶17

9. With the aforesaid observations, this application is finally disposed of at this stage.

¶18

(Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.)

¶19

March 18, 2026 SK Goswami

¶20

Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shubham v. Smt Apoorva Yadav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shubham v. Smt Apoorva Yadav

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jageshwar Singh vs Sri Shyam Narayan and Another

Prem Chandra Srivastav vs Vishal Kumar Sharma, Tehsildar

Mahendra Singh and 2 Others vs Ravi Kumar N.G.

Shiv Kumar vs Sri Shyam Narayan Senior Superintendent of Police and Another

Mohd. Jamal vs Deen Dyal Singh

Chhedi Lal vs Shri Anuj Kumar Jha, Director, Local Bodies Uttar Pradesh and 2 Others