Single-line order dismissing a contempt application for want of prosecution as the applicant's counsel was absent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1372 of 2012
Hari Om Dixit And Others
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
Deepak Singhal Principal Secy. Irrigation Deptt. And Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Y.K.Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : C S C
Court No. - 8
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
Case has been called out.
The present case is listed under the heading "These matters shall not be adjourned".
A notice has been pasted outside the Court room prescribing that the matters listed under the heading "These matters shall not be adjourned" shall not be revised and appropriate orders shall be passed in the first round itself.
Neither the learned counsel for the applicant is present nor any request has been made on his behalf for adjournment of the case.
In view of the above, the contempt application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Notice issued, if any, stands discharged.
(Manish Kumar,J.)
October 17, 2025
Ashish
Digitally signed by :- ASHISH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Hari Om Dixit And Others
Deepak Singhal
Manish Kumar
Ashish
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
