Contempt application dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant's counsel was absent and no adjournment request made; compliance affidavit filed by the opposite party went unchallenged and any notice stood discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1317 of 2024
Ankita Nigam
.....Applicant(s)
Versus Dr. Surya Kant, Deptt., Of Respiratory Medicine, Kgmu, Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Mishra, Rajat Raj Narayan Bajpai, Vineet Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Shubham Tripathi
Court No. - 8
HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J.
February 11, 2026 DiVYa
(Manish Kumar,J.)
Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Ankita Nigam
Dr. Surya Kant, Deptt. of Respiratory Medicine, KGMU, Lko.
Manish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
