A bail cancellation application was dismissed for want of prosecution because the applicant failed to appear before the court to press the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 39 of 2024
Manoj Kumar Pandey
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ayodhya Prasad Shukla, Alok Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Deo Prakash Srivastava
Court No. - 28
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
Case called out in the revised list.
The case pertains to the year 2024.
None appears on behalf of the applicant to press this bail cancellation application nor any request for adjournment has been made.
Learned A.G.A. is present.
Accordingly, the present bail cancellation application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Rajeev Bharti,J.)
April 28, 2026
Shravan
Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Manoj Kumar Pandey
State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 2 Others
Rajeev Bharti
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
