Kaif Vs State of U.P.

Heard Shri Virendra Pal Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Shashank Singh, learned Brief Holder for the State-respondents and perused the record.

¶10

This bail application under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant, seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 486 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 333, 109(1), 118(2), 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Sahawar, District Kasganj.

¶11

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the accused-applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case crime number. It is further submitted that the applicant has been languishing in jail since 20.09.2025.

¶12

Learned counsel for the applicant further contended that the applicant has no motive to commit the alleged offence. It is also submitted that the charge-sheet has been submitted on 07.11.2025 and cognizance has been taken on 17.12.2025, and therefore, no further custodial interrogation is required in the matter.

¶13

It is further submitted that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and

¶14

BAIL No. 9653 of 2026

¶15

2

¶16

there is no likelihood of the applicant fleeing from the course of justice or tampering with the prosecution evidence in the event of his release on bail. Accordingly, prayer has been made to enlarge the applicant on bail.

¶17

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant, but could not dispute the aforesaid fact.

¶18

Considering all above facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out.

¶19

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed .

¶20

Let the accused-applicant, Kaif, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail , on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:

¶21

1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.

¶22

2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity.

¶23

3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and cooperate in the trial.

¶24

4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned.

¶25

In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail.

¶26

(Ashutosh Srivastava,J.)

¶27

May 12, 2026 Vibha Singh

¶28

Digitally signed by :- VIBHA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Kaif v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kaif v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pawan Yadav vs State of U.P.

Sandeep vs State of U.P.

Kishor vs State of U.P.

Chanchal Vs State of U.P.

Imtiyaz Ali Vs State of U.P.

Vivek Vs State of U.P.