Disposed¶16

Anish Alias Phoolchandra v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC12 Mar 2026BAIL/8041/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application — trial delay — report called for from trial court — date of charge framing — prosecution witnesses proposed and examined — adjournments with reasons — interim order, no decision on merits — Allahabad High Court, Krishan Pahal, J. — Anish Alias Phoolchandra v. State of U.P. — listed 27.4.2026 — order via Registrar (Compliance).

What did the court decide?

Interim directions only: trial judge to submit a fresh report on trial status and cause of delay; matter listed on 27.4.2026; copy of order to be conveyed to the trial judge through the District Judge. ¶16

Anish Alias Phoolchandra vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶16

Issue for consideration

What is the status of the trial and the cause for the delay in concluding the trial of the present case.

¶10

Court's answer

Directed the learned Trial Judge to forthwith send a fresh report on the status of the trial and the cause for delay, in tabulated form.

¶10

Ratio / Principle

Prescribed the contents of the report: (i) date of framing of charge; (ii) number and particulars of prosecution witnesses proposed; (iii) witnesses examined with dates; (iv) instances of witness presence and adjournments with reasons.

¶12

Key takeaways

If the trial has been decided, the trial court need not send those details but must mention the date of disposal and the result.ratio¶15
Matter to be listed with previous papers on 27.4.2026 in the daily cause list along with the report.ratio¶16
Copy of the order to be communicated to the learned trial judge through the learned District Judge by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX.ratio

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Allahabad High Court (Krishan Pahal, J.), Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 8041 of 2026 — Anish Alias Phoolchandra v. State of U.P. and 3 Others: None appeared for the applicant when the list was revised. The Court directed the learned Trial Judge to forthwith send a fresh report on the status of the trial and the cause for delay, in tabulated form, covering (i) the date of framing of charge, (ii) the number and particulars of prosecution witnesses proposed to be examined as per the charge sheet, (iii) the witnesses already examined with dates, and (iv) instances of witness presence and adjournments with reasons. If the trial stands decided, the trial court need only intimate the date of disposal and the result. The matter was listed with previous papers on 27.4.2026, and a copy of the order was directed to be communicated to the trial judge through the learned District Judge by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX. Interim order; no merits decision on bail.

Anish Alias Phoolchandra v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anish Alias Phoolchandra v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhishek vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Manu Kumar vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Nitin Bata @ Harsh Tomar vs State of U.P.

Manoj vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Raju vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ankit vs State of U.P. and 3 Others