Jai Kumar @ Kanha v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application — delay in trial — fresh status report called for from trial court — tabulated particulars: date of charge framing, prosecution witnesses proposed and examined, witness presence and adjournments with reasons — listing on 15.4.2026 with previous papers — communication through District Judge by Registrar (Compliance) — Allahabad High Court — Krishan Pahal, J. — Jai Kumar @ Kanha v. State of U.P. — interim order; bail not decided.
What did the court decide?
Interim procedural direction only: the learned Trial Judge to forthwith send a fresh report on the status of the trial and cause for delay, in tabulated form (i) date of framing of charge, (ii) number and particulars of prosecution witnesses proposed as per the charge sheet, (iii) names/number of witnesses examined with dates, (iv) instances of witness presence and adjournments with reasons; details unnecessary if the trial is decided, in which case the date of disposal and result are to be mentioned; matter listed with previous papers on 15.4.2026; copy of the order to be communicated to the trial judge through the learned District Judge by the Registrar (Compliance) by e-mail/FAX. Bail application not decided.