Dismissed¶15

Tavish Raza v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC22 Apr 2026BAIL/7178/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail rejected; Tavish Raza v. State of U.P.; Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 7178 of 2026; Allahabad High Court; Harvir Singh, J.; decided April 23, 2026; Section 109 BNS 2023; Sections 3/25/27 Arms Act 1959; Case Crime No. 504 of 2025; P.S. Didauli, District Amorha; firearm injury to neck, right-sided haemopneumothorax, bullet in right hypochondrium; injured Arman Sonu; dispute over marriage of injured's sister; custody since 29.11.2025; no criminal antecedents; observations confined to bail disposal.

What did the court decide?

Having regard to the evidence on record and the applicant's complicity in the crime, including the firearm injuries caused to the injured Arman Sonu when he visited the applicant's house regarding the status of his sister's marriage, the court found no good ground to release the applicant on bail and rejected the bail application.

Tavish Raza Vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7178 of 2026

Tavish Raza

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Hasham, Syed Faiz Hasnain Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 70

¶7

HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J.

¶8

Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.

¶9

This bail application has been moved on behalf of the accused-applicant/ Tavish Raza, for grant of bail, in Case Crime No. 504 of 2025, under Section 109 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections 3/ 25/ 27 of the Arms Act, 1959, Police Station Didauli, District Amorha, during pendency of trial.

¶10

Learned counsel for accused-applicant, while pressing the bail application, submits that, the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case and has not committed any offence, as alleged by the prosecution. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that, allegations of causing firearm injuries to the injured have been levelled against the applicant in the first information report of this case, while the injured has visited the house of the applicant on 8.11.2025, for having some conversation with regard to solemnize marriage of his sister with the applicant. However, it is claimed by the applicant that, sister of the injured was married to the applicant way back on 15.9.2025, about two months prior to the alleged incident, as per Muslim rites and rituals, therefore, the entire prosecution story is false, baseless, concocted and fabricated. Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that, the accused-applicant is languishing in jail in this matter, since 29.11.2025, without having any criminal antecedents and there is no likelihood that, the accused-applicant, after release on bail, may flee from the process of law or will misuse the liberty of bail.

¶11

Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of State opposes the prayer for bail of the applicant on the ground that, as per discharge summary of the injured, he was got admitted in the hospital on 8.11.2025 and got discharged on

¶12

BAIL No. 7178 of 2026

¶13

¶14

20.11.2025, which shows that, injuries caused to the injured are grievous in nature and his treatment was going on for about 12 days. Learned AGA further submits that, discharge summary of the injured also shows firearm injury on neck, left hand with right sided hemopneumothorax with metallic density (Bullet) in right hypochondrium; lacerated wound over mid anterior neck 1x1 cm, lacerated wound over dorsal side left hand 1x1 cm at root of middle finger; lacerated wound 1x1 cm over left palm at root of thumb of the injured , therefore, having regard to the manner, in which the crime has been committed, the applicant is not entitled to be released on bail.

¶15

Having considered the rival contentions of the parties and having perused the record, it is evident that, the injured Arman Sonu has visited the house of the accused- applicant for the purpose of seeking clarifications from the accused- applicant, as to whether he still intends to marry his sister or not; if not, then the accused- applicant shall discontinue making any conversations or meetings with the sister of the injured Arman. However, the said conversation regarding the status of marriage was not liked by the applicant and the applicant in retaliation, shot fire upon the injured, who sustained firearm injury on neck, left hand with right sided hemopneumothorax with metallic density (Bullet) in right hypochondrium; lacerated wound over mid anterior neck 1x1 cm, lacerated wound over dorsal side left hand 1x1 cm at root of middle finger; lacerated wound 1x1 cm over left palm at root of thumb. The applicant without considering the fact that, the applicant is likely to marry the sister of the injured, has opened fire, resulting in grievous injuries to the injured and the act is not pardonable or no sympathy could be given to any such person, as accused- applicant. Thus, having regard to the evidence available on record against the applicant and his complicity in the crime, I do not find any good ground to release the applicant on bail. Hence, the bail application moved on behalf of applicant - Tavish Raza is hereby rejected.

¶16

Observations made herein-above by this court are only for the purpose of disposal of this bail application and shall not be construed as an expression of this Court on the merits of the case.

¶17

April 23, 2026 Gurpreet Singh

¶18

(Harvir Singh,J.)

¶19

Digitally signed by :- GURPREET SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Tavish Raza v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tavish Raza v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pradeep @ Chhote Vs State of U.P.

Azeem Husain Vs State of U.P.

Bhola and Another Vs State of U.P.

Junaid Vs State of Up

Faisal vs State of U.P.

Azeem Husain vs State of U.P.