Disposed¶8

Sateesh Kumar v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC18 Feb 2026BAIL/5948/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court adjournment order in bail matter; Sateesh Kumar v. State of U.P.; CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5948 of 2026; coram Hon'ble Vivek Varma, J.; decided February 18, 2026; learned A.G.A. had not received instructions; case listed as fresh on 25.02.2026; no holdings, no statutes, no precedents, no quantum; minimal citation value.

What did the court decide?

No substantive relief; case adjourned - learned A.G.A. submitted he had not received instructions, and the case was directed to be placed as fresh on 25.02.2026. ¶8

Sateesh Kumar vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5948 of 2026

¶3

Sateesh Kumar

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

		Versus
State of U.P.				.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	:	Nilesh Singh	Kumar Yadav,	Surya Bhan
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	:	G.A.
Court No.- 64

¶6

HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. submits that he has not received the instructions in the instant case.

¶8

Place this case as fresh on 25.02.2026.

¶9

(Vivek Varma,J.)

¶10

February 18, 2026

¶11

SKT/-

¶12

Digitally signed by :- SHIVA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sateesh Kumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sateesh Kumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vijay Singh vs State of U.P.

Nazar Mohammad vs State of U.P.

Shahrukh vs State of U.P.

Saurabh Chaudhary vs State of U.P.

Sadan vs State of U.P.

Pancham vs State of U.P.