Disposed¶8

Bindu Devi v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC13 Feb 2026BAIL/5345/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Adjournment order in bail matter — Bindu Devi v. State of U.P., Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 5345 of 2026, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Court No. 64, Hon'ble Vivek Varma, J., dated February 13, 2026; learned AGA had not received instructions; case to be listed as fresh on 23.02.2026; digitally signed by LAL BAHADUR MAURYA.

What did the court decide?

None; the matter was adjourned and directed to be listed as fresh on 23.02.2026. ¶8

Bindu Devi vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5345 of 2026

¶3

Bindu Devi

¶4

.....Applicant(s)

¶5

		Versus
State of U.P.		...	..Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	:	Aditya Vikram, Jagriti Yashvant Kumar Venvansh	Pandey,
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	:	G.A.
Court No.- 64

¶6

HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.

¶7

Learned AGA submits that he has not received instructions in the present case.

¶8

Place this case as fresh on 23.02.2026.

¶9

(Vivek Varma,J.)

¶10

February 13, 2026

¶11

Lbm/-

¶12

Digitally signed by :- LAL BAHADUR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Bindu Devi v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bindu Devi v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Piyush Chaudhary vs State of Up and Another

Shriram vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Vikram vs State of U.P.

Vikas Sonkar vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Anil Kumar vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Nitesh Bhartiya vs State of U.P.