Harsh @ Vicky v. State of U.P.
Bail application – interim/procedural order – Allahabad High Court (Krishan Pahal, J.), order dated 13.02.2026
Case brief
What is this about?
Harsh @ Vicky v. State of U.P., Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 4991 of 2026, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Krishan Pahal J., order dated 13.02.2026: interim direction to the trial court to furnish a tabulated status report of the pending trial (date of charge framing, prosecution witnesses proposed/examined, adjournments with reasons; or date of disposal and result if trial concluded); matter listed with report on 16.03.2026; applicant's counsel Tarun Jha; G.A. for the State; no statutes or case law cited; purely procedural order, bail not decided.
What did the court decide?
Interim procedural directions only; the bail application was not decided on merits. The Trial Judge was directed to send a fresh tabulated status report of the trial (charge-framing date, prosecution witnesses proposed and examined, adjournments with reasons), the application was listed with the report on 16.03.2026 in the daily cause list, and a copy of the order was directed to be communicated to the trial judge through the Registrar (Compliance).