Shubham @ Chhotu v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The order does not dispose of the matter; the bail application is adjourned and connected with related cases for hearing on a future date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45270 of 2025
Shubham @ Chhotu
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State of U.P.
.....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arvind Giri, Jitendra Kumar Shishodia, Krishna Gautam, Swati Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 70
HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J.
- Learned counsel for the applicant and Sri S.N. Rai, learned AGA for the State-respondent are present.
- Connect alongwith records of Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos.43937 of 2025, 39598 of 2025 and put up as fresh on 7.1.2026.
January 5, 2026 RA
(Santosh Rai,J.)
Digitally signed by :- RAZIQ ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Shubham @ Chhotu
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Santosh Rai
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · January
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/45270/2025
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court