Disposed¶11

Bagchandra Prajapati v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC5 Jan 2026BAIL/45210/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bagchandra Prajapati v. State of U.P.; Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 45210 of 2025; Allahabad High Court; Santosh Rai, J.; adjournment sought by learned AGA (S.N. Rai) to obtain instructions; matter listed fresh on 12.1.2026; counsel for applicant: Manoj Kumar; no substantive order, no ratio, no citations.

What did the court decide?

Adjournment granted at the request of the learned AGA; matter to be put up as fresh on 12.1.2026. No substantive order passed on the bail application. ¶11

Bagchandra Prajapati vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45210 of 2025

Bagchandra Prajapati

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶7

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Manoj Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.
Court No.- 70

¶8

HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J.

¶9

Learned counsel for the applicant and Sri S.N. Rai, learned AGA for the State-respondent are present.

¶10

Learned AGA seeks adjournment in order to obtain instructions in the matter.

¶11

Put up as fresh on 12.1.2026.

¶12

January 5, 2026 RA

¶13

(Santosh Rai,J.)

¶14

Digitally signed by :- RAZIQ ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Bagchandra Prajapati v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bagchandra Prajapati v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pankaj Sahu Alias Shree Pankaj Shah vs State of U.P.

Shakir Ali vs State of U.P.

Atul Kulshreshtha vs State of U.P.

Pintu vs State of U.P.

Kush vs State of U.P.

Preetam Kumar vs State of U.P.