Disposed¶14

Monu Alias Vinay Jaiswal v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC20 Jan 2026BAIL/44944/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court; Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 44944 of 2025; applicant Monu @ Vinay Jaiswal; second bail application; first bail application Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 45336 of 2024 rejected 25.08.2025; co-accused Ilhan @ Ilihan granted bail by coordinate Bench 26.11.2025; fact witnesses Rishu Pandey and Saurabh Dubey not eye witnesses; hearsay evidence; parity with co-accused; Ashutosh Srivastava, J.; case listed afresh 03.02.2026; no final order on bail; January 20, 2026.

What the court decided

AI extract

Monu Alias Vinay Jaiswal vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44944 of 2025

¶3

Monu Alias Vinay Jaiswal

.....Applicant(s)

Versus

State of U.P.

.....Opposite Party(s)

¶8

Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Chandra Prakash Singh	Mishra, Manish Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶9

Court No. - 68

¶10

HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J.

¶11

Heard Shri C.P.Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant.

¶12

Present is second bail application on behalf of the applicant Monu @ Vinay Jaiswal. First bail application of the applicant being Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 45336 of 2024 was rejected by this Court vide order dated 25.08.2025.

¶13

Shri Mishra, while pressing the second bail plea of the applicant submits that subsequent to rejection of the bail plea of the applicant, co-accused Ilhan @ Ilihan has been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 26.11.2025. While granting bail to the said co-accused the Coordinate Bench has noticed that two fact witnesses namely Rishu Pandey and Saurabh Dubey, in their depositions had stated that they were not eye witnesses and they have given hear-se evidence which has no evidentiary value in the eye of law. He submits that the said fact is sufficient for releasing the applicant on bail. Certain other arguments have also been advanced.

¶14

In order to appreciate the submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the applicant, let this case appear, as fresh, on 03.02.2026 along with the records of previous bail application being Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 45336 of 2024.

¶15

January 20, 2026 Deepak/

¶16

(Ashutosh Srivastava,J.)

¶17

Digitally signed by :- DEEPAK KUMAR KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Monu Alias Vinay Jaiswal v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Monu Alias Vinay Jaiswal v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dharmendra Vs State of U.P.

Ibran Vs State of U.P.

Manni Panchal Vs State of U.P.

Akaram Ali vs Union of India

Kanhaiya Verma vs State of U.P. and Another

Sarabjeet vs State of U.P.