In a criminal bail application, the bench observed that notice issued for service on the informant was not properly served and directed issuance of a fresh notice through the relevant CJM, returnable within three weeks.
Issue notice to the informant through the concerned CJM, returnable within three weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44852 of 2025
Rizwan
.....Applicant(s)
Versus
State Of U.P. And 3 Others
.....Opposite
Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudhakar Shukla
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.
Court No. - 68
HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J.
Learned AGA at the very out set submits that notice issued for the service of informant has not been served properly.
In view of above, issue notice to informant / opposite party no. 2 through CJM, concerned, returnable within three weeks.
List as fresh on the date mentioned in the service of notice.
(Ashutosh Srivastava,J.)
January 16, 2026
Ravi Prakash
Digitally signed by :- RAVI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether notice to the informant had been properly served.
Whether notice should be issued to the informant through the concerned CJM.
Rizwan
RAVI PRAKASH
ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
