Surendra Kumar Yadav v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Allahabad HCBAIL/43861/2025
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Bail application pending before the High Court; State counsel reported notice served on the informant but no compliance affidavit filed. Court granted ten days to file the affidavit and listed the matter afresh.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
¶2
CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43861 of 2025
¶3
Surendra Kumar Yadav
¶4
.....Applicant(s)
¶5
Versus State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Prince Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 67
¶6
HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.
¶7
- Sri Prince Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Ashutosh Singh, learned AGA for the State are present.
¶8
- At the very outset, learned AGA submits, however, as per his instructions notice has been served upon the informant but he could not file any compliance affidavit. He prays for and is granted 10 days' time to file compliance affidavit in this regard.
¶9
- Put up this again as fresh on 11.03.2026.
¶10
(Sameer Jain,J.)
¶11
February 24, 2026
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Surendra Kumar Yadav
- respondent
State Of U.P.
Coram
AI extract
Sameer Jain
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/43861/2025
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Sameer Jain
- Order 2 — this page · Sameer Jain
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court