Disposed¶¶7

Rubina v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC2 Feb 2026BAIL/42661/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Allahabad High Court listing order; Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 42661 of 2025; Rubina versus State of U.P.; Vivek Varma, J.; Court No. 64; counsel for informant absent; case to be listed fresh on 10.2.2026; no bail decision rendered, no ratio, no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

No decision on the bail application; the case was adjourned and directed to be listed as fresh on 10.2.2026. ¶¶7

Rubina vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

¶2

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 42661 of 2025

¶3

Rubina

¶4

		Versus	.....Ap	plicant(s)
State of U.P.			....	.Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: :	Awadhesh Ku Kumar Singh Anuj Kumar Shanker Srivasta	mar Pandey, Chaudhary, va, G.A.	Chandra Ganesh
Court No.- 64

¶5

HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J.

¶6

Case called out in the revised list. Counsel for the informant is not present.

¶7

Place this case as fresh on 10.2.2026.

(Vivek Varma,J.)

February 2, 2026

S.S.

Digitally signed by :- SIDDHARTH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rubina v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rubina v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases

Shamsher vs State of U.P.

Zeenat vs State of U.P.

Sovaran Singh vs State of U.P.

Rakesh Pandey vs State of U.P.

Swati vs State of U.P.

Smt Kamla vs State of U.P. and Another