Nazim v. State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 41589 of 2025

Nazim

.....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Irshad Ahmad, Ziauddin Farooqui Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Ajay Kumar Mishra, G.A., Nasiruzzaman

Court No. - 67

HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.

1 . Heard Sri Ziauddin Farooqui, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri B.P. Maurya, learned AGA appearing for the State respondents and Sri Ajay Kumar Mishra and Sri Mohit Kumar Jaiswal, learned counsel for the first informant.

2 . The present bail application has been filed on behalf of applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 16 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 103(1) BNS and Section 3/25 of Arms Ac, registered at Police Station Rehra, District Amroha, during pendency of the trial.

3 . It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted three co-accused Qamar Khan, Saleem and Rehan have already been granted bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court and the role of the applicant is not distinguishable from the role of above coaccused. It is further submitted that there is no eye witness of the occurrence and so-called eyewitnesses have reached the place of the occurrence after the incident was over and he has been languishing in jail since 13.2.2025 and he is having criminal history of 18 cases and in all the cases he is on bail. It is also submitted that the applicant undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted. It has also been pointed out that in the wake of heavy pendency of cases in the Court, there is no likelihood of any early conclusion of trial.