Rajnish Singh @ Sahil Yadav Vs State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40814 of 2025

Rajnish Singh @ Sahil Yadav

V	ersus		.....Appli	cant(s)
State of U.P.			.....O P	pposite arty(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Ajay Singh Brij Singh	Kuma Yadav Napit,	r Pal, , Nishan Vikrant	Arjun t, Ram Pratap
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶4

Court No. - 70

¶5

HON'BLE JAI PRAKASH TIWARI, J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

The applicant is involved in Case Crime No. 277/2025 under Sections 109(1), 303(2), 317(2), 317(4) BNS Police Station Gopiganj District Bhadohi.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that innocent and falsely implicated in this very case crime number. It has been further submitted that co-accused- Prem Sahu @ Munna Rai, Noor Navi and Sudhir Dubey have been granted bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court vide orders dated 26.9.2026, 12.08.2025 and 28.07.2025 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application Nos. 26591 of 2025, 26705 of 2025 and 24711 of 2025. Hence, the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. It has also been submitted that applicant has previous criminal history, which has been explain to the present bail application as well as to the supplementary affidavit. The applicant is in jail since 29.08.2025. Learned counsel for the applicant has further submitted that if the applicant is released on bail, they would not misuse liberty of bail and are ready to co-operate in the trial.

¶9

BAIL No. 40814 of 2025

¶10

2

¶11

Learned A.G.A. has, however, opposed the prayer for bail but he has not disputed the above contention made by the learned counsel for the accused-applicant.

¶12

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, perusing the record and also considering the nature of allegations, arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, I find it to be a fit case for granting bail.

¶13

Let applicant- Rajnish Singh @ Sahil Yadav , be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on their furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions, which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶14

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that the applicants shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence.

¶15

(ii) The applicants shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through their counsel. In case of their absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against them under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

(iii) In case, the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against them, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii)

¶18

BAIL No. 40814 of 2025

¶19

3

¶20

framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicants are deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶21

If the applicants does not follow any of the above condition, bail application shall be rejected automatically.

¶22

May 5, 2026 S.K.

¶23

(Jai Prakash Tiwari,J.)

¶24

Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rajnish Singh @ Sahil Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajnish Singh @ Sahil Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kaif @ Mohammad Kaif Kamal vs State of U.P.

Manvir @ Manoj Kumar vs State of U.P. and Another

Devendra Kumar Yadav vs State of U.P. and Another

Devendra Singh @ Devendra Singh Parihar vs State of U.P.

Ravi Pandey vs State of U.P. and Another

Lakhan Singh vs State of U.P.