Raj Kumar @ Pintu Maurya v. State of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail allowed after non-bailable warrant issued for non-appearance despite earlier bail; Section 307 I.P.C.; Case Crime No. 2417 of 2006, P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur; first bail application; absence explained by counsel's advice, father's death and relocation; medical grounds (heart patient, surgery, BP, sugar); in jail since 06.10.2025; order of court below liable to be set aside; release on personal bond and two sureties; additional bail conditions including Section 313 Cr.PC attendance; observations to have no bearing on merits; Allahabad High Court Lucknow Bench; Rajeev Bharti, J.; May 20, 2026.
What did the court decide?
Bail application allowed; applicant Raj Kumar @ Pintu Maurya to be released on bail in Case Crime No. 2417 of 2006 (Section 307 I.P.C., P.S. Kotwali Nagar, District Sultanpur) on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to additional conditions: cooperation with the prosecution during trial; no tampering with evidence; no pressurising/intimidating prosecution witness(es); no commission of offence; no inducement, threat or promise to dissuade disclosure of facts; presence before the trial court on each date fixed, personally or through counsel; no adjournment on dates fixed for evidence when witnesses are present; and in-person presence on dates fixed for recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.PC. On default of these conditions, the trial court may treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.