Dismissed¶15

Anuj Yadav v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC1 Apr 2026BAIL/36176/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anuj Yadav v. State of U.P., Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 36176 of 2025, High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, decided April 2, 2026 by Harvir Singh, J. Bail application dismissed under Sections 115(2) and 109 B.N.S.; allegation of pushing a 25-year-old passenger out of a moving train resulting in amputation of both legs; gravity of offence weighed against bail; applicant in jail since 30.7.2025 with no criminal antecedents; direction for expeditious trial; GRP Etawah.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for enlargement on bail rejected; no bail granted. Trial court directed to conclude the trial expeditiously without unnecessary adjournments. ¶15

Anuj Yadav Vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36176 of 2025

¶2

Anuj Yadav

¶3

.....Applicant(s)

¶4

	Versus
State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Ankita Tiwari, Pramod Kumar
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

¶5

Court No. - 70

¶6

HON'BLE HARVIR SINGH, J.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.

¶8

By means of this application, the applicant who is involved in Case Crime No. 62 of 2025, under Sections 115(2) and 109 of B.N.S., P.S. G.R.P., Etawah, District-Etawah, is seeking enlargement on bail during the trial.

¶9

As per first information report the son of the informant was traveling from Panki Dham to Kanchhosi Bazar on the Kanpur-Tundla Intercity train on 28.7.2025 at about 4:40 PM. During the journey, an altercation took placer between him and the applicant over some issue; in response, the applicant physically assaulted the son of the informant namely, Mukesh Kumar, aged bout 25, and pushed him out of the moving train, as a result of which the son of the informant struck the platform and fell beneath the train, resulting in the amputation of both his legs.

¶10

Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to some ulterior motive. He next submitted that no such incident had, in fact, occurred, and that the applicant had no involvement whatsoever with the alleged incident. The reality is that the alleged victim fell from a moving train as a result of an accident. He lastly submitted that the applicant, who is in jail since 30.7.2025 and has no criminal antecedents to his discredit is entitled to be enlarged on bail during pendency of the

¶11

BAIL No. 36176 of 2025

¶12

¶13

trial.

¶14

On the other hand, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the applicant had pushed the victim off a moving train, whereupon the victim came under the wheels of the train, resulting in the amputation of both his legs. He further submitted that the applicant has committed a heinous crime, hence he is not entitled to be enlarged on bail.

¶15

In view of the nature of the injuries and the gravity of the offence, wherein a young man has lost both his legs, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail, accordingly, the bail petition is dismissed.

¶16

However considering the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the trial court is directed the conclude the trial of the applicant as expeditiously as possible without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties.

¶17

(Harvir Singh,J.)

¶18

April 2, 2026

¶19

Faridul

¶20

Digitally signed by :- FAREEDUL HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Anuj Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anuj Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nilesh Yadav vs State of U.P.

Deepak Kumar Aggarwal vs State of U.P. and Another

Praveen Jain vs State of U.P.

Shyamlal Bhuiyan Vs State of U.P.

Happy @ Harpreet vs State of U.P.

Salman vs State of U.P.