Asraf and Another v. State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33376 of 2026

Asraf And Another

		..	...Applicant(s)
	Versus
State of U.P.			.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Arvind Singh	Kumar Singh,	Dharm Jeet
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.
Court No.- 69

HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

1. Heard Sri Dharam Jeet Singh, learned counsel for accused applicants and learned A.G.A. for State.

1. The present bail application has been moved by the applicants/accused- Asraf and Israfil Ali to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 54 of 2026, under Sections 109(1), 191(2), 191(3), 115(2), 117(2),351(3), 324(4), 3(5) BNS, P.S.- Gadwar, District- Ballia, during the pendency of trial.

1. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that the accused applicants have been falsely implicated in the FIR dated 06.03.2026 lodged for the incident occurred on05.03.2026 that six named accused including the accused/applicants have assaulted the husband of informant and her relatives. It is alleged in the FIR that accused persons assaulted Khursheed and Gudia with lathi and danda due to which Khursheed and Gudia suffered injuries. It is further contended by the learned counsel that no specific role assigned to the accused/applicants. Both the injured suffered simple injury except one injury to Gudia, which is fracture of right hand. The applicants and the informant are of same village. There is old enmity between the parties. The charge sheet is submitted. The accused/applicants have no criminal history. The co-accused Naushad Ahmad and Irshad have already been enlarged on bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court. The accused applicants are languishing in jail since 03.08.2026. They seek to be enlarged on bail.