Vivek Kumar Gautam v. State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33375 of 2026

Vivek Kumar Gautam

.....Applicant(s)

	Versus
State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Arvind Kumar Srivastava, Sunil Kumar Saroj
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

Court No. - 65

HON'BLE SAMEER JAIN, J.

1. Heard Sri Sunil Kumar Saroj, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Kunwar Tejendra Bahadur, learned AGA, for the State.

1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with the prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No.111 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352 and 103(1) BNS, Police Station Rajatalab, District Varanasi during pendency of the trial.

1. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that however, applicant was not named in the FIR but during investigation when second statement of the informant was recorded then very casually he disclosed the name of the applicant along with others. He next submits that admittedly informant of the case was not the eye witness.