Tinku v. State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33374 of 2026

Tinku

.....Applicant(s)

	Versus
State of U.P.			.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Mary Kalim	Puncha (Sheeb	Jose), Mohd.
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

Court No. - 69

HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

1. Heard Sri Faizan Ahmad, learned advocate, holding the brief, appeared for the accused-applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

1. The present bail application has been moved by the accused-applicant Tinku to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 881 of 2015, under Section 307 IPC, P.S.- Deoband, District- Saharanpur, during the pendency of trial.

1. It is contended by learned counsel for the accused-applicant that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in F.I.R. dated 06.11.2015 lodged by the informant that three accused persons including the accusedapplicant have opened fire on informant's brother. The role of firing is attributed on all the three persons. The accused-applicant has moved the writ court, wherein his arrest was stayed. Later on, the final report was submitted and a protest petition was moved by the informant, the same was treated as a complaint. The applicant never came to know about the pendency of the trial in complaint case and when he came to know about the processes, he has surrendered before the court on 27.07.2026 and since then, he is in jail. The other two co-accused have already been granted bail by the coordinate Bench of this Court. The applicant has one case criminal history, wherein, he is on bail. The applicant is in jail since 27.07.2026 and hence, the applicant seeks to be released on bail.