Nazim v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33359 of 2026

Nazim

	Versus	.....Applicant(s)
State Of U.P. And 3 Others		.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)		: Irshad Ahmad
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)		: G.A.

Court No. - 68

HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.

1. List has been revised. As informed by learned State Law Officer, notice to the informant has been served on 11.9.2026.

1. Heard Sri Irshad Ahmad, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri R.P. Singh, learned State Law Officer and perused the material placed on record.

1. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 76 of 2025, under Sections 89, 238, 351(3), 127(2), 64(2)F BNS and 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Hajratnagar Garhi, District Sambhal, during the pendency of trial.

1. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The victim has been examined as P.W.-2 during trial and she has completely resiled from her earlier statement given to the Investigating Officer and the allegations of the FIR, as she is stated to have married the applicant. The witness has been cross-examined by the public prosecutor after declaring her hostile. There is no likelihood of conviction in the present case under the circumstances. The fundamental rights of the applicant as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India stand violated.