Arif v. State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33332 of 2026

Arif

	Versus	.....Applicant(s)
State of U.P.		.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)		: Mohd Imran Khan
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)		: G.A.

Court No. - 69

HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

1. Heard Mohd. Imran Khan, learned counsel for accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.

1. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant/ accused- Arif to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 823 of 2015, under Sections 419, 420, 392, 342, 504 and 506 IPC, P.S.- Kosikalan, DistrictMathura, during the pendency of trial.

1. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that the FIR has been lodged on 26.11.2015 by one S.Srinawasan Kiran against two named persons, namely, Rahul and Raju and some anonymous persons with the allegation that the informant has been duped of money for the purchase of gold bars. The informant when came to purchase the gold bars, the money has been taken but forged gold bars have been given by the accused. The role of accused/applicant attributed during investigation is that he has transported the informant on his motorcycle to the village of the coaccused. It is further contended that there is no other complicity attributed on the accused/applicant. No amount has ever been credited to the account of accused. He has no knowledge of any cheating with the informant. The applicant was not knowing about submission of charge sheet. He was never arrested during investigation. The accused/applicant has criminal history of five cases, out of which in two cases final report is submitted, in two cases he is on bail and in one case he is in jail. When he was in jail Warrant B was issued against accused/applicant. The accused