Mukesh Kumar and 2 Others v. State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33329 of 2026

Mukesh Kumar And 2 Others

.....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Raghuraj Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 69

HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

1. Heard Sri Raghuraj Singh, learned counsel for accused applicants and learned A.G.A. for State.

1. The present bail application has been moved by the applicants accused- Mukesh Kumar, Edal Singh @ Yashveer Singh & Arvind Singh to enlarge them on bail in Case Crime No. 214 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 115(2), 352, 351(3), 109(1), 110, 117(2) BNS, P.S.Bharthana, District- Etawah, during the pendency of trial.

1. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicants that the accused applicants have been falsely implicated in FIR dated 19.07.2025 lodged by the informant with the allegation that the accused persons, who are thirteen in number pertaining to one family had assaulted the informant and his family members with Kulhadi (axe) and kicks and fists wherein seven persons suffered injuries, out of them two persons namely Rajendra and informant Raguwar Singh suffered grievous injuries. Rajendra suffered fracture of parietal bone, whereas Raghuwar Singh suffered fracture on parietal and ulna bone. It is the contention of learned counsel that both the parties are of same family and there was altercation between them and FIR has already been lodged against the injured by co-accused Mahesh Chandra wherein six persons have been named in the FIR for assaulting two persons from the side of accused, who suffered injuries. There was an altercation between the parties on the point of dumping of garbage in the land. The applicants have no criminal history. The