Rijwan v. State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33323 of 2026

Rijwan

	Versus .....Applicant(s)
State of U.P.	.....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s)	: Pravita Singh, Vikash Chandra Tiwari
Counsel for Opposite Party(s)	: G.A.

Court No. - 69

HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

1. Heard Sri Dhirenda Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel holding brief appeared for the accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.

1. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant/ accused- Rijwan to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 94 of 2026, under Sections 310(2), 311, 317(3), 61(2) BNS, P.S.- Crossing Republic, District- Ghaziabad, during the pendency of trial.

1. It is the contention of learned counsel for applicant that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated during investigation in FIR dated 06.05.2026 lodged by the informant with the allegation that while they were engaged in reloading of the money in ATM, the Van in which the currency notes are kept has been robbed by the anonymous persons. During investigation, the name of co-accused Kaif has been figured out and in the disclosure statement of the co-accused. Six persons were named including the accused/applicant, who is pursuing law. It is further contended that the accused/applicant has no criminal history, he has been falsely implicated in this case. The applicant is languishing in jail since 11.05.2026. The charge sheet is submitted. There is no other material available against the accused/applicant than the confessional statement. He seeks to be enlarged on bail.