Angira Devi v. State of U.P.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD

CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33295 of 2026

Angira Devi

.....Applicant(s)

Versus
State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rahul Kumar Pandey
Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A.

Court No. - 69

HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J.

1. Heard Sri Rahul Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the accusedapplicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

1. The present bail application has been moved by the accused-applicant Angira Devi to enlarge her on bail in Case Crime No. 187 of 2026, under Sections 137(2), 87 BNS, P.S.- Vishnupura, District- Kushinagar, during the pendency of trial.

1. It is contended by learned counsel for the accused-applicant that the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated in F.I.R. dated 07.07.2026 lodged by the brother of one of the victim, who was taken away by the accused-applicant, a married lady. Further contended that the two alleged victims in their statements have stated that they are friends and went along with the accused-applicant. They hailed from the same village and were taken to the matrimonial home of the accused-applicant at Shahjahanpur. Later on, they have returned to their families. Further contended that there was no injury as is shown in the medical report. It was not the enticement and the accused-applicant has been falsely implicated. The learned counsel has drawn the attention of this Court towards the statement of informant after return of his sister that his sister went somewhere, although the F.I.R. has been lodged prior to it, specifically against the accused-applicant. She is a 23 years old married lady and having no mens rea to commit any offence. The charge sheet is submitted. The applicant has no criminal history. The applicant is in jail since 11.07.2026 and hence, the applicant seeks to be released on bail.